New technologies are constantly spawning opportunities for
businesses to change the way in which they operate. Many consultancies and software vendors will
talk happily to their clients of the transformational nature of these
technologies and wax lyrical about the opportunity to fundamentally reengineer
the business. However, having been
involved in leading “big change” programmes over the last 20+ years I am all
too aware of the fact that the “T” word is one of the most overused there is in
the change business. So, having been
asked recently to ponder the difference between straight forward business
improvement and transformational business change I thought I’d drop down a few
thoughts to help dowse the hyperbole and look afresh at what it means to transform
a business.
So here is my reading of the subject, which to be fair, is a
bit of a mash-up of the work of some pretty serious philosophers,
anthropologists and sociologists who spent a lot of time thinking about the way
the world changes and my own experiential observations. In this context, perhaps one of the most
useful and insightful views on the difference between business improvement and transformation
was shared with me recently by the venerable Bill Cook – CEO of Capgemini
Consulting UK. Bill looked at the
challenge through the lens of technology maturity.
“In the development cycle of any new wave of technology (from
the dawn of computing through the development of mainframes, the proliferation
of desk top technology, the development of business process specific technology
and onto the digital and cloud based services) there are always two specific
phases. The first phase is where the
technology is new and businesses can choose from a multitude of providers to
help “improve” their business capabilities.
The key challenge in this phase is the choice of the right vendor to fit
with the current business processes or structures. The second phase is where the new technology
has matured and the market has consolidated (think business process technology consolidating
onto SAP or Oracle platforms). During
this phase the impact of implementing the new technology is so large that rather
than fit the technology to your business you are impelled to fit your business
to the technology. The key challenge in
this phase is how do I change my business to maximise the benefits from this
new technology. This is transformation.”
This is certainly a pretty good and pragmatic way of looking
at the difference and works well.
Another way of looking at the challenge that I quite like is to look at
the “scope” of the change. If the “change”
is fundamentally altering the structures, processes and ways of working within your
business then I think its a fairly safe bet to call it transformation – if the
technology is merely enhancing one of the elements (structures, processes, ways
of working) then that is business improvement. It’s a simple and relatively loose view but
not a bad way of looking at the difference.
For the purists, who really understand what Thomas Kuhn
meant, by the now much misused concept of the paradigm shift, a Transformation
is a much rarer thing that only occurs when an idea, concept or technology so
changes our perception that holding onto the old ways of thinking and operating
seems ridiculous – imagine the new options that emerged when we discovered the
world wasn’t flat and that the Earth revolved around the Sun. What is fascinating is that in Capgemini and
MIT’s recent series of research into the concept of Digital Transformation the
conclusion was that the advent of digital capabilities was of such a profound
nature that it has the same transformational potential of the technologies of
the industrial revolution. http://www.capgemini-consulting.com/digital-transformation-a-road-map-for-billion-dollar-organizations
So to conclude – if you are implementing a set of business
wide, linked, digital technologies that are changing your businesses structure,
process and ways of working it’s fair to say you are transforming your
business. If you are automating a single
process it is pretty likely you are engaged in Improvement. Everything in between is debatable. Have fun debating it.
Thanks for this Rick; some good ideas here. Your very last point is the one that exercises me! The extremes are easy to discern; the blurry bit in the middle is the source of a lot of obfuscation, grandiose posturing etc. It's a bit like the situation where every small business owner is now an entrepreneur..
ReplyDeleteThe thing I'm noodling on is whether the idea of 'process transformation' specifically is a bit of a non sequitur. Process improvement makes sense; but what I'm wondering is whether, in the context of true business transformation, one of the indicators is that we're actually completely throwing away processes and then inventing new ones.
I think I agree - process transformation is a non sequitur in today's business world - can't really talk about transformation unless the change being delivered alters structures, processes and ways of working. Even having a new process "delivered digitally" is not a real transformation unless there is a substantial requirement on the business to reinvent its structures and ways of working to cope. Re your point on "its only transformation when we are throwing away old processes" - I think I prefer the idea of "swapping processes" rather than throwing them away. For example - when a new "utility" player transforms the way a service is delivered in a marketplace (e.g. Transco in the Energy marketplace) many of the processes previously needed to support a vertically integrated set of business are swapped for ones that make sense when those businesses are arranged horizontally.
DeleteIf we stick with throwing away I think some cloud providers will insist that the businesses they are serving throw away their old processes and replace them with their predefined one. They will call this process transformation - i will call it process improvement - ie I took my old talent management process and improved it by buying a new one from a cloud provider. However, it is still a talent management process.
Thought provoking, as ever, Rick. Here's my own take on automation and the transformative potential of IT, largely influenced by my time at you know where :-) http://blogramme.com/2013/06/18/dr-watson-will-see-you-now/
ReplyDeleteIan - really enjoyed your blog - think you might be on to something there
ReplyDeleteGrowing in a way that help us with learning things and in the same way This factor of knowing that what is scrum is a help for sure that works for us quite finely.
ReplyDeleteWonderful! By the way, I'm considering implementing microsoft dynamics 365 for financials in my company, however, I'm not sure if our budget will take it. What would you do?
ReplyDeleteA great article with ample of information of digital transformation. Every details has been taken up thoroughly. The forecast of about 20+ years ahead is a great market research.
ReplyDelete