Reader Warning: If you are looking for the kind of levity,
light-hearted banter and insightful amusement I usually conjure up after a
couple of stiff sherrys then this is probably not the blog for you. This one is
a bit serious and is the first in a series of similarly serious blogs that will
take an in depth look at the sub-processes that underpin the process of Corporate
Innovation. That doesn’t mean the blogs
will be dull (hopefully far from it) rather they will be quite technical and
suitable for those that consider themselves practitioners in the field of
Innovation. Warning over, read on at
your peril!
This blog is about Ideation* – the elemental
and almost magical sub-process at the very genesis of the Corporate Innovation
process. It is a much misunderstood
process and a little explored one. The
generation of ideas is often seen to be the exclusive, secret domain of the
visionary entrepreneur, the maverick R&D guy or the corporate alchemist,
certainly not the result of a process that can be quantified, systematised and
regularly replicated. Now whilst these
rare corporate beasts can undoubtedly catalyse and accelerate the process they
are most definitely not the process itself and quite often they can actually
slow or derail the process in a fit of pique.
Now I have written about the detrimental propensity of CEOs to seek out
these Wizard of Oz types in a previous blog and so won’t replay that rant here. Suffice to say, in practice, the process of
Ideation itself is a bit more mundane than the magicians and snake oil salesmen
would have us believe. The generation of
useful ideas is a lot more about the outcome of the hard,
disciplined work, carried out by dedicated professionals than the result of a favoured
kiss from the ideas muse. Those that have been tasked with delivering
Ideation will nod sagely on hearing award
winning novelist Philip Pullman’s quote “Amateurs
think that if they were inspired all the time, they could be professionals. Professional know that if they relied on
inspiration, they'd be amateurs.”
So how does an Innovation professional
set about generating a set of quality ideas that can potentially be formed into
concepts that can be prototyped and tested? There are three key elements for the
Innovation professionals to assemble.
The first essential element is having access to a rich source of ideation inputs – the thoughts, suggestions,
ideas, tech and stimuli required to generate innovative concepts. The second is having a reliable, generative ideation process through which to sort, play
with, combine and recombine the inputs in a way that generates innovative
concepts. The third is having access to a creative team of stimulated professionals
whose brains this ideation process will be carried out in.
The rest of the blog will look at each
of these elements in detail. Without
these elements Ideation is a random, haphazard and rare occurrence, pretty much
what it actually is for many corporates.
A quick but related digression, I still
smile to myself when I remember working with a UK high tech manufacturer that
was short on ideas. I asked them to
arrange a meeting with the senior managers to discuss the Innovation
process. “Ooh,” said the coordinator,
“we can use the Innovation room.” I
replied that sounded great. On the day
of the meeting I was ushered into the Innovation room – which turned out to be
an oblong, grey walled, windowless room with plastic seats arranged in rows. Strangely I didn’t have to work too hard that
day to convince the client that they needed to make changes – especially of
they wanted to think outside the very grey box in which they literally and
metaphorically found themselves. So
let’s get to it.
1) Creating a rich source of Ideation Inputs
Generating rich inputs requires high
quality networking and an ability to expand and leverage the relationships and ecosystems
of the corporation. Below is a table of
a tiny fraction of the different ways Corporates can and do plug into a flow of
ideas from the easy to access to the more hard core link ups.
Hard Core
|
Serious
|
Traditional
|
Easy
|
Tech
Partnerships
|
Academic Links
|
Industrial
Tourism
|
Conferences
|
Tech Start Up
Links
|
Commissioned
Research
|
Staff
Suggestions
|
Social Media
Feeds
|
Specialist
Idea Brokers
|
Supplier Ideas
Forums/Fairs
|
Customer
Feedback/Complaints
|
Guest speakers
|
Patent
Tracking
|
Big Data
Analytics
|
Internal Data
Analytics
|
Literature
reviews
|
The key here is to generate a
manageable flow of ideas that those charged with generating Innovation concepts
can handle. Too few ideas and the
Innovation hopper will be barren, too many ideas and the Innovation hopper will
be overflowing and unmanageable, creating waste and disillusionment. N.B. There is no single “secret source”(sorry),
the successful Corporate Innovators will
have a whole raft of sources from which they draw ideas. The key skills required for delivering a rich
source of ideas are network building and curiosity.
2)
Developing a
reliable, generative Ideation Process
Now this element is a little more
complex and a source of heated debate between Innovation professionals. Again there is probably no right answer here
but there are probably better ones. The
minimum requirement is the ability to structure the time spent playing with, combining,
refining and assessing the ideas. This
is serious play. There are numerous
techniques available ranging from the basic brainstorming processes, through
analytical and scoring techniques to the more developed Triz process and its
modifications and abstractions. The key
factor here is that the Innovation professionals actively manage themselves
through a process or a series of processes.
The complexity here is that the processes have to encourage room for
play, spontaneity, what if debates, flights of fancy and slack time whilst
maintaining their rigour as a process.
As a result facilitation is key.
The key skills required to be able to develop and operate a reliable,
generative ideation process are playfulness, curiosity and facilitation skills.
3)
Building a
creative team of Dedicated Professionals
Finally it is important to
remember that innovation is not some abstract event. Humans are not just catalysts in the process
they are a living Innovation substrate.
Ensuring that your Innovation team is in the best possible shape to
innovate is therefore important. This,
of course, means that recruiting or renting the right people, with the right
aptitudes to work effectively as part of an Innovation team is crucial, as is
providing them with the right physical locations, stimuli and props. However, it does not mean keeping them overly
comfortable. Necessity is the mother of
invention and diversity and conflict (in small doses) can be excellent
catalysts. I’m aware I’m making this
sound a little like alchemy and of all the elements I’ve looked at in this blog
this is the one that is the most esoteric.
However, having an effective team leader that can manage the state of
their team to enhance Innovation is a real find. Whether that means exposing the team to
third world experiences or cosseting them in comfy cushions, the ability to
keep changing it up is essential. The
key skills required to build a team of creative, dedicated Innovation
professionals are therefore team management and creativity.
Hopefully that has provided a bit
of an insight into Ideation, the primary sub-process of Innovation and its base
elements. There’s much more that can be
said and written about these elements but that is not the stuff of a blog. Do get in touch if you wish to discuss. Further blogs on the other sub-processes will
follow.
N.B. I’d be remiss if I didn’t add
that in today’s digital environment it is also possible to “outsource” the
ideation process by setting up hackathons, hosting social media discussion
groups, sponsoring prizes for innovative solutions and all manner of other
mechanisms. These are all relatively new
mechanisms but are proving popular and well worth trying. Have fun Innovating.
*The
process of ideation in a corporate setting is the process for the generation of
ideas that, if applied to the corporation, could have a relevance to one or
more of the stakeholders of the corporation.
No comments:
Post a Comment